Here's what a real higher duly impaneled court inside this very State of Ohio's judiciary
has concluded, once several years ago, about the supposed mental health related issues
concerning his practice and aiblity to represent individuals in this State before
the the various Court of Ohio...
Its NOT what the state ethic chief Assistant Prosecutor, a former Board of Grievance's
Chair and some redneck disciplinary counsel
from Mahoning County Bar Association's have cobbled together and have made
into a literaly smear campaign about him and his otherwise sound legal abilities
It is the opnion they want NO ONE to read and they themselve ignored, despite
being informed about the same prior to their motions and moves being made
against my interests before the Supreme Court of Ohio
"The record also reflects that the mental health evaluation would serve no purpose to the contempt that occurred here. If he submits to the evaluation, he stil must serve the sentence in jail. It is an order to submit to an evaluation, not counseling. Thus, it has no rehabilitative, restorative, or even punitive effect, as sentencing is designed to achieve.
Furthermore, there is nothing in the record of this case or evident in the court's findings demonstrating that a mental health evaluation is relevant or proper.
The record does not reflect a history or indication of mental health issues. The presentence investigation mentions nothing about mental health issues and opines that appellant is in good health. Accordingly, based on the record here, this court hereby deletes the portion of the sentence ordering appellant to submit to a mental health evaluation. "
This is NOT just any lawyer or myself talking here. This is the proper duly deliberative
opnion of one very busy and active Court of Appeals from the very county wherein the
original discipilnary actions arose. This court knows me personally and they know my work
as well. I have won a few cases before them and I have been known to several of their
judges for years.
They were independent and judicious in reaching their opinion and they did not give me a
complete pass either on this case. But on the seriously misleading conclusory allegations
that some distractors of mine wish to try to keep making a public issuse for me over,
they clearly speak to the very same issues as to why I am not taking the so called
"board ordered" mental health evaluation. Its an unamerican thing to submit to an unlawful
and baseless order and I have a strong record of both criminal and civil rights advocacy behind me to back this stance up, not to mention, a verified published court of appeals opinion
that some among this profession simply have seriously and intentionally ignored.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
